The following videos show Dawkins for the charlatan behind the magic curtain that he really is.
This evolution "guru" can't even answer the ONE foundational question upon which all of evolutionary theory hinges... That is, can he name just ONE example - in the entire world - of an instance where a mutation resulted in an increase in information in the genome?

Dawkins aught to be ashamed of himself, promoting a theory that he knows is false.  But like most atheists, he is at war with the God he says he does not believe in and like most atheists, he wages his war by waving his fist at God while trying, like a child, to erase God from his world by saying "I don't believe you exist", much like an ostrich hiding his head in the sand, hoping that something he does not like or is fearful of will simply go away by wishing it would.  He thinks if he gets enough people to agree with him, he will feel more comfortable in his rebellion against his Creator. The reason why so many atheists are waging this war is because they don't like the world that God created, believing - in their conceit - that if they were God they would have done a better job in creating the world... they would have created a kinder, gentler world... never wanting to take responsibility for the rebellion, self-centeredness and outright evil in their own hearts.

A Fairy Tale
by Richard Dawkins

Once upon a time, there were some worms that decided they had been worms long enough and that it was time for them to become people, so they decided they should start eating lots of radioactive plutonium so that they could start mutating into higher life forms.  The only problem with their plan was they didn't know where to get the plutonium. But then one day, some plutonium fell out of the sky, and landed right in their worm-hole.  What a tremendous stroke of luck for those frustrated worms!  So they all started munching on the plutonium, and before long, they started to mutate!  One mutated into a worm with 2 heads and another mutated into a worm with 2 tails.  But none of them mutated into any other kind of creature. So they then realized that besides the plutonium, they would need some additional genetic material, so they invented gene splicing.  But then they had another problem: they had no higher life-forms to derive the genetic material from that was needed for the gene splicing.  So they invented fairy tales so they would be able to talk about how they already became people even though they still looked like and acted like worms.  To make things sound convincing, every time they told their fairy tales they would include sophisticated scientific terminology like "millions and millions of years", "countless positive mutations", "the fossil record", "similarities in DNA", "evolutionary family tree", "gene pool" and "survival of the fittest".  And as time went by, and as more and more worms repeated the fairy tales, more and more worms became convinced that they were really people who had mutated out of worms a long, long, looong time ago, after an unfathomable number of intermediate mutations.  So remember: the key to making fairy tales believable is to talk about things as if they were indisputable facts rather than pure wishful thinking AND absolutely positively AVOID mentioning ANY evidence in the real world* that would expose the fairy tales for what they really are. And it also helps to REPEAT the fairy tale as often as possible, never calling it a fairly tale but instead saying that you are simply stating scientific FACTS - facts that should be OBVIOUS to any intelligent worm, I mean person. Also, be sure to make fun of anybody who says the fairy tale is only a fairy tale.  In addition, you must NEVER allow anyone to find out that your fairy tale is based on a RELIGION, the religion of secular humanism.  Lastly, be sure to start teaching your fairy tales when your audience is young and trusting and not yet skilled at independent thinking. The End.

In case you have not yet figured it out, the above article was not really written by Dawkins but is a fairly accurate summation of what he believes about origins, once you strip his evolutionary flatulence of all its scientific sounding jargon.

* Real world evidence that evolutionists don't like to talk about: astronomical mathematical probabilities, molecular machines, the law of entropy, symbiotic systems, fraudulent transitional fossils, a fossil record devoid of transitional life-forms, etc.